Vol. 3 No. 4
Winter 2009
Not Hunted, But Not Protected
In Dr. Jon Beckmann’s article “Bears Will Be Bears”
in the Winter 2009 issue of The Wildlife Professional, he states under the heading ‘The Price of Conflict’
that bears have a protected status in Nevada. While
Nevada does have classifications for protected and
unprotected wildlife, black bears are actually classified as a game mammal with a closed hunting season.
The distinction is significant. Though black bears
are currently not hunted, they are not a protected
species and therefore do not have protected status.
If they were a protected species it would create
even more management challenges. The article has
generated a couple phone calls to my office and may
warrant this clarification.
Kevin C. Lansford
Furbearer/Predator Staff Specialist
Nevada Department of Wildlife
Vol. 3 No. 3
Fall 2009
Semantics Matter
A “General” news item on page 18 of the State of
Wildlife department in the Fall 2009 issue of TWP
presented inaccurate information. The piece concerned a federal District Court decision to overturn
the 2008 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule. The
news item stated that the National Forest Management Act of 1976 requires that the Forest Service
provide for the diversity of plant and animal species.
This is not correct. NFMA requires that the agency
“provide for diversity of plant and animal
communities” (emphasis mine).
This is not merely a semantic issue. The precise
wording of statutes and associated regulations matters, as does an understanding thereof by wildlife
professionals—particularly as more and more
resource conservation decisions are made by the
courts. Framers of the 1976 legislation understood
that a species-by-species approach to conservation
on our national forests simply isn’t possible due to
limited financial resources and gaps in our knowledge of even the most basic life history information
for literally thousands of species. Hence the importance placed on a community-based approach.
Dan Dessecker, CWB
Director of Conservation Policy
Ruffed Grouse Society
Find full text
of all letters
online.
Please send letters to: editor@wildlife.org
Support for Young Professionals
Several previous issues of The Wildlife Professional,
containing articles on certification, diversity, and education, have precipitated this letter. Though I agree
that wildlife biologists and managers must have
well-rounded knowledge to be successful, I believe
some of the ideas suggested in TWP are unrealistic.
I don’t believe an educational track characterized by
pre-medical intensity will attract a diverse base of
wildlife students. Some students may not recognize
wildlife studies as a viable career path until late into
university. Those highly experienced undergraduates
who do emerge from rigorous wildlife programs will
soon be thrust into a field unable to absorb the available workforce or pay reasonable wages.
For early-career professionals, particularly technicians, there is little employer support for formal
professional development such as courses at the
National Conservation Training Center. And the costs
of taking an advanced academic course through a university can outweigh the potential career benefit.
I would like to propose some ideas to support the
commendable goals of social diversity and academic
professionalism advocated in TWP:
1. A TWS membership and event registration fee
tier available to low-paid, degree-holding wildlife
technical workers.
2. A scholarship or grant program for post-university
developing professionals to attend TWS conferences and workshops or academic classes.
3. An online forum for TWS members to arrange
shared travel and lodging for TWS conferences or
workshops.
4. A host biologist program in TWS conference
locations to offer lodging and mentoring to young
attendees.
5. A decentralized professional development program, where qualified TWS members lead low- or
no-cost workshops and can earn communications
credits for certification.
6. An urban high school visitation program, where
TWS biologists present wildlife career options and
can earn communications credits for certification.
7. An outreach program to wildlife employers,
emphasizing the importance of professional networking and career development.
8. A TWS standardized testing system, where
members who have proficiency in a subject can
demonstrate their knowledge as required for
TWS certification.
Kristina Boyd, M.S.
Wildlife Technician
U.S. Forest Service and Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks